Quantcast
Channel: Real Estate
Viewing all 4385 articles
Browse latest View live

A penthouse at one of New York's most billionaire-packed towers has listed for $59 million

$
0
0

15cpw

The ultra-luxury market may be slow, but that's not stopping one owner at 15 Central Park West from listing a sprawling penthouse for $59 million.

The condo — measuring roughly 5,300 square feet — is asking $11,132 per square foot. It has four bedrooms, 5.5 baths and a 34-foot gallery facing Central Park, according to the listing, which does not specify which penthouse is being sold. 

But it appears the seller is Bob Diamond, former CEO of Barclays, who reportedly snagged a 40th-floor apartment matching the unit's description in 2009 for $37 million, according to the author Michael Gross, whose book "House of Outrageous Fortune" chronicles the rise of 15 Central Park West. According to Gross' account, which couldn't be independently confirmed, Diamond purchased the pad through LLCs titled Novgorod and Novgorod Two in the wake of the financial crisis from a London-based investor, who bought the unit from Zeckendorf Development for $21.89 million.

Listing broker Matthew Mackay of Douglas Elliman declined to comment.

Though it's the priciest unit currently available at the Robert A.M. Stern-designed condominium, the penthouse's asking price falls well short of the building's record sale.

That distinction still belongs to the $88 million penthouse that Russian billionaire Dmitry Rybolovlev bought from former Citigroup chairman Sandy Weill in 2011. The 6,744-square-foot unit went for $13,048 per square foot.

Last year, a duplex on the 18th and 19th floors of the building sold for $45 million — $8,021 per foot — significantly less than the original asking price of $65 million. The buyer was an entity known as Evergreen 15 CPW, which subsequently listed the unit for rent asking $125,000 per month.

One of the city's glitziest and most exclusive buildings, 15 Central Park West is home to hedge funders Daniel Loeb and Daniel Och, along with Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein, the actor Denzel Washington and the rocker Sting.

For the 12 months that ended September 30, the average price per square foot at 15 Central Park West was $6,735, according to City Realty.

Other pricey listings include steel magnate Leroy Schecter’s 35th-floor pad, which is currently asking $43.5 million, or $7,767 per foot. Schecter once wanted $95 million for the unit, but has dropped the price several times.

SEE ALSO: These photos show how drastically Manhattan's Financial District has evolved since the '70s

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Take a look inside the most expensive home in America at $200 million


6 things that determine how fast a home will sell

$
0
0

neighborhood

When you decide to sell your home, the last thing you want is for it to sit on the market forever, especially if you're already packed up and moving to your new digs.

Conversely, you might not be ready for your home to go under contract within the first few days after listing it. So how can you plan? Is there a way to predict a quick home sale?

Besides relying on a psychic reading, there are some real-world ways to make a fairly accurate prediction of how fast your home will sell.

Heed the following information to learn how to price your home right and predict how long it'll be on the market, especially if your home is in San Jose, California, or one of the other top 10 fastest-moving markets

1. The price

The best way to influence how fast your home will sell is by the price you set. Want yours to sell right away? Price it at or below market value, a figure you arrive at based on what comparable homes in the area are selling for and your home's appraisal value. Price higher if you don't care how long it takes to sell. "The best time to get noticed is the first few days your property hits the market," says Mor Zucker, a Denver, CO, real estate agent.

If you price too high, people searching for a lower price range might miss your listing. Meanwhile, your home competes in a price range with homes that are probably more attractive than yours because of location, size, or condition — or all three. You'll probably need to eventually reduce the price to sell. "You've now started chasing the market instead of the buyers chasing you," says Zucker.

Another tactic you can use is house numerology. Sellers often use the number 9 or 5 as the last numeral in their home's sale price — in fact, more than half (53%) of home listings end in the number 9. This is so homeowners can stay within a set price "range" without giving up value. Ending your listing in the number 5 is a good way to bring down the price some, but not all the way.

2. Your willingness to negotiate

If you'll not accept a penny less than full asking price, expect your house to sit longer than others in your area. After pricing too high, "a reluctance to negotiate is the second reason homes stay on the market a long time," says Trip duPerier, owner of Texas Landman LLC. "A solid offer is nothing to scoff at," he adds.

You should also be aware of what price range people are looking for in your market. Trulia's MarketMatch report found that 10.4% of national home searches at a certain price point failed to match the available inventory at that price. For example, if you are selling a home and have priced it in a higher range that very few people are interested in, you can expect it to sit on the market for a while — even if starter homes around the corner are flying off the market in one week.

3. The photos

Want your home to sell fast? Besides making it look nice and spiffy on the outside and staging it indoors, get it photographed by a pro. "Having good photos of your home can definitely shorten the amount of time your property sits on the market," says Zucker. Buyers naturally gravitate to homes that have better photos, and, according to Corridor Home Photos, listings using professional photography typically sell 50% faster than homes without professional photos.

4. Crunching the numbers

If you got an A in statistics class, you'll love this method to determine how long your house will sit. It involves inventory levels, median market time, median sales price, and percentage of list-to-sales prices. "If the inventory of homes is low, the house will sell faster," says John Lyons, a Chicago, IL, real estate broker. Your house will take longer to sell in a buyers' market that has lots of inventory.

Looking at how many days on average it takes for similar homes in your area to sell gives you an idea of how long yours will take. This is assuming a median sales price. Pricing below or above that affects how long the house will sit. "Percentage of list-to-sales prices is an indicator for how closely the list prices assigned by sellers reflect the value a buyer is willing to pay," says Lyons. If the percentage is over 100%, homes sell for more than list price. Less than 100%, and homes sell for less. The actual number tells you how much more or less. This stat varies depending on location.

5. A good agent

It's important to choose an agent with experience selling homes like yours and one who's familiar with the area. "The right real estate agent can make a huge difference in how long it takes to sell a home," says Pamela Colombana, a California real estate agent. A good agent knows how to prep your home for sale and will be skilled at marketing it.

6. An honest approach to your sale strategy

Atlanta, GA, real estate agent Bruce Ailion once listed a home with a leisurely 120-day listing period, not knowing the homeowners had to sell pronto. "They called me after only 30 days and asked me what it would take to sell their home in the next 30 days. They were quite anxious and agitated," recalls Ailion.

Turns out, the husband was to report to federal prison in 30 days. But the sellers didn't want to reveal that … until they heard the clock start ticking. Ailion, after making a substantial reduction, sold the property in time. His lesson: "Being honest about your time requirements helps get the best price."

SEE ALSO: 9 hidden costs that come with buying a home

DON'T MISS: 'They're just wrong': A financial expert fires back at people who say you should rent a home instead of buy

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Here's how much you need to make to be in the top 1% of every state

Chinese buyers are getting ripped off on Vancouver real estate

$
0
0

Vancouver

Looking for Vancouver real estate and think you’re getting the shaft? Well don’t feel too bad, there’s a few sellers that are looking to take foreign buyers for even more of a ride. Here’s our favorite listings on the other side of the Great Firewall, that are pushing the boundaries of what foreign buyers are willing to pay.

2660 Croydon Drive

This plot of land is in Surrey, but is being advertised in Beijing as a 10.9 acre residential development site in “Vancouver, Canada.” The asking price is $21,000,000 for the rights to the agricultural land where “the owner has applied to the City of Surrey for Development Permit to develop four residential towers of 18 storeys each.” Since the land isn’t approved for building yet, and it’s currently zoned as agricultural land – the assessment value for the address listed is $9,538. Heck, the whole zip code is only assessed at $11,464,838. It was apparently purchased by the owner in 1970 for $27,500. A 76,263% return over 46 years is a solid return.

Probably worth noting that some local residents are also petitioning the development, but it’s not like politicians have ever listened to residents. Oh yeah, the people petitioning are also under the impression that it’s three towers, so…that’s going to be awkward when they find out.

4075 Dominion Street

Did you know that Vancouver is considered a part of Hong Kong by some people? Because I didn’t. Listed as “Burnaby-Vancouver,” this 4 bedroom is on Craigslist Hong Kong as Hong Kong real estate for sale by the broker. The listing is asking Hong Kong buyers for $1,175,000 plus taxes for the recently renovated suburban duplex. It’s also listed on the Canadian MLS for a $1,140,000– so you can “save” $35,000 by spending twenty seconds and putting the home’s address into Baidu.

9318 205 Street

This slick unit is being sold as a 4 bedroom in “Vancouver, Canada,” but is actually located in Langley. The house is listed on Hong Kong’s Craigslist for $1,720,000 by “the owner” – which doesn’t seem that bad considering it does have top of the line finishes. Property records show it was purchased for $1,250,000 in January 2015 – a 37% markup before the foreign buyer tax. We couldn’t find the listing anywhere in Canada, so the seller is probably hoping locals cruise Craigslist Hong Kong for “local property” for sale. Which to be honest, I do…so it’s not all that far fetched.

SEE ALSO: 4 reasons China is nervous about US Fed's interest rate hike

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A psychologist reveals a trick to stop being lazy

Rents are finally dropping in New York City, and a bubble might be about to pop

$
0
0

new yorkThe Cubs won the World Series, Donald Trump is the president-elect, and the rent in New York appears to be falling.

In October, the share of New York City rentals that took a price cut, according to the listing tracker Streeteasy, topped 42 percent—the highest level since December 2010. The real estate firm Citi Habitats, which draws data from its own listings, reports that the vacancy rate in Manhattan has climbed to 2.1 percent, its highest level since 2009. Both of those indicators, in other words, are back in Great Recession territory. "It's a renter's market right now," says Chris Lee, the director of sales at Triplemint, a real estate startup.

We don't know yet why that is, or how long it could last. Certainly, rents have outpaced incomes. White-collar tenants are less geographically selective than they used to be. New construction has caught up with demand. But whatever the reason, it looks like rents are about to dip ... and then some.

It is hard to overstate the impact of New York's high residential rents. They all but elected mayor Bill de Blasio, whose campaign's theme was correcting for inequality. They have driven homelessness to record levels and continue to monopolize the disposable income of millions of New Yorkers. They have caused dozens of commentators to question the city's very identity as a haven for the castoffs and dreamers of middle America and strivers from the rest of the world.

And because the problem of high rents is so general to American cities right now, if New York's rental bubble is about to pop, it may offer a lesson to places like Los Angeles.

First, a caveat: It's hard to generalize about rents. Different brokerages pull data from different stocks of apartments and report different findings. Some say New York's rents are already falling faster than any high-cost market in the country. Most say that prices have softened or stabilized.

But there's reason to suspect that rents are on the cusp of a larger decline. That discounts and vacancy are at a seven-year high is part of it. But charts like the one below, from Streeteasy, that show rents reaching a plateau are likely a little behind the times.rent nyc

For one thing, part of the shift toward a buyers' market has been disguised by widespread and growing "concessions"—landlords offering a month or two of free rent, for example, but leaving the monthly rate the same. In August, the New York Timesreported on this phenomenon in Downtown Brooklyn, where a massive building boom has seemingly created a new skyline overnight. Nearly every building was offering one to four months of free rent.

It's not just Brooklyn. According to Citi Habitat, 27 percent of Manhattan transactions featured a "concession" in November 2016—meaning real, lower rates for tenants aren't being reflected in rent data. The concession rate has more than doubled since last year. Douglas Elliman, another broker, reports that rents are down in Brooklyn and Manhattan and also says that concessions have doubled in both boroughs from this time last year.* That is not part of the normal seasonal downturn in rents that happens at year's end.

The other thing about market reports is that they are out of date. They show how things were going six to eight weeks ago. A sample of December listings shows an even sharper decline.

Urban wonk Stephen Smith, tweeting at Market Urbanism, has been collectingsome of these listings. A Williamsburg one bedroom down to $2,500 from $3,500 in 2014—with a free month's rent. An East Village one bedroom at $2,695—same as its rent in August 2009—and still unrented. A Hell's Kitchen one bedroom, rented in 2014 for $3,750, down to $3,250, and still unrented. A two bedroom in Downtown Brooklyn down 30 percent since July—with two free months. A two bedroom in Williamsburg down $600 from last year, with two months free. A brand-new apartment overlooking Prospect Park, down more than $600 to $2,940 since it was first listed in July—and still available. A studio in the West 30s listed for less than it rented in 2013.

A three bedroom on the Upper East Side that, after eight price chops, is back to its 2010 rent—and down more than $1,000 since 2013. Oh, and the apartment comes with two free months—on a 16-month lease (which, in a city where rents were rapidly rising, would be more favorable to tenants).

These are anecdotes, of course. I haven't been to these apartments; maybe they're in bad shape. Maybe their landlords got lucky, or greedy. But Smith's point is that this is all happening day by day. Those rent-price graphs are already propped up by developer concessions. And they haven't factored in drops like these.

What's more, if it is a glut, the glut is likely just beginning. 2015 was a record year for residential building permits in New York City—with developers pressed by expiring loopholes, the city authorized nearly 35,000 new units in the second quarter and nearly 10,000 more in the fourth. Total permits topped 50,000—more than any year since the early 1960s. And many of them aren't done yet—according to the U.S. Census Bureau, about half of all multiunit projects take more than 13 months from the permitting date to be completed. One look at the skyline will tell you that the city is still very much in the throes of a building boom.

That skyline in Downtown Brooklyn? That's what a tenant's market looks like.

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: A psychologist reveals a trick to stop being lazy

5 things to know before you refinance your home

$
0
0

House home neighborhood

Even though rates spiked after the election and may rise further after the Fed meets December 14, there are about four million borrowers who will still benefit from refinancing, and of that, two million borrowers could save $200 or more per month by refinancing.

There are many reasons to refinance, but here's what you should know before you act.

Refinancing costs money

There's no such thing as a free refinance. You'll need to pay closing costs, which typically run anywhere from 2-5% of your loan amount. So, if you're refinancing a $150,000 loan, you might pay between $3,000 and $7,500 in closing costs upfront.

One option you have is for your mortgage lender to cover the closing costs using a no-closing cost refinance. But if you go that route, you'll pay a slightly higher interest, says Ray Rodriguez, regional mortgage sales manager at TD Bank.

Therefore, "you need to calculate your time horizon," says Rodriguez.

Before selecting a no-cost refinance, look at what the closing costs would be if you were paying for them separately, then calculate how long it would take the monthly payment savings from a refinance to repay the closing costs. Once you do that you can more accurately determine whether a no-closing cost refinance is mathematically sound for your situation.

Use a refinance calculator to see how long it will take for you to recoup the closing costs. If your breakeven point is four years but you only plan to stay in the home for two years, refinancing isn't a smart move.

Savings should repay costs quickly

Refinancing makes sense when your interest rate on your mortgage is more than 100 basis points above current interest rates, says Todd Sheinin, a mortgage lender and chief operating officer at New America Financial in Gaithersburg, MD.

Of course, everyone has different objectives, so there's no hard and fast rule on how much you should save, but generally your refi costs should be recouped in about two years or less.

For example, if you got a 30-year fixed loan of $200,000 loan in March 2011, your rate would have been 4.83%, according to Freddie Mac. This week that rate is 4.13%.

So if this refinance cost you $2,800 and saved you $179, your savings would repay the closing costs in 15 months. This means that after one year and three months, you'd truly benefit from the lower payment — a very favorable refi scenario.

In contrast, if you got that same $200,000 30-year fixed loan in August 2013, your rate would've been 4.45%. So if you paid $2,800 to refinance into this week's rate of 4.13% and only saved $93, your savings would repay the closing costs in 30 months.

This is six months past the two-year mark, so it would take a while to truly benefit from the refi. But some may deem the $93 per month savings meaningful enough to refinance. This is a discussion to have with your lender.

Before you commit, be sure to do your homework and compare refinance rates from multiple lenders.

A refi could cancel your PMI

If you're currently paying for private mortgage insurance (PMI) on your loan but have gained a substantial amount of equity in your home, refinancing could enable you to cancel your mortgage insurance.

Your loan balance must be 80% or less of your home's appraised value in order for this to work, says Richard Redmond, mortgage broker at All California Mortgage in Larkspur, CA and author of "Mortgages: The Insider's Guide."

If your first mortgage is 80% or less of your home's value when it's appraised for the refinance, your new loan wouldn't require PMI, and this new loan would replace the loan with PMI, thus cancelling your PMI obligations.

You're rewinding the clock on your loan

When you refinance, you're effectively resetting the life of your home loan. So if you've had your loan for many years, you've reached a point in your loan where most of your monthly payment is going to paying the loan down (rather than paying interest). Refinancing the loan will change this dynamic, so most of your payment is going to interest rather than paying your loan down.

Ask your lender to do a side-by-side loan amortization comparison so you can see how fast you'll pay off your existing loan versus a new loan. Also ask them to show you how much faster you'd pay off the new loan if you took the savings from a refinance and applied it as an extra monthly pay-down on the new loan.

Your equity could be a good source of cash

A cash-out refinance lets you take out a new mortgage for more than the amount you owe on your current loan and then pocket the difference — typically up to 80% of your loan-to-value ratio. That can be a good move, depending on how you're planning to spend the money, says Rodriguez.

If you're going to use the cash to build an addition to your home that's going to increase your property's value, taking a cash-out refi makes sense. But keep in mind that cash-out refinance rates are slightly higher than rates for non-cash-out refinances.

If you're going to use the money for discretionary spending, such as a vacation, think twice. It's not advisable to use cash out proceeds for discretionary spending, although lenders don't prohibit you from doing this.

One caveat: If home values in your neighborhood are decreasing, now may not be the right time to tap your equity. "Before you pull equity from your home, you need to weigh the costs and benefits," Rodriguez says.

SEE ALSO: Here are the differences between the 2 types of mortgages you can get

DON'T MISS: 13 things that will trash your home's value

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: NASA just spotted a massive hole growing on the sun — here’s what it means

'The housing bust appears bigger than the boom' even after 7 years of recovery

$
0
0

abandoned house

Looking at the US economic landscape as it stands, it appears that in many parts of the country, the fallout from the financial crisis has been cleaned up.

The stock market is at an all-time high, the unemployment rate is at levels not seen since before the recession, and wages are on the rise. One notable exception, according to Scott Brown at Raymond James, is the housing market.

The growth of the housing market has been a relative laggard. Given that the epicenter of the financial crisis was the housing market, it's no surprise that it has taken longer than the rest of the economy to recover.

"In a number of ways, the housing bust appears bigger than the boom," Brown wrote in a note to clients. "The housing recovery was always expected to take several years, but improvement has been even slower than anticipated."

Brown highlighted several housing metrics, such as single-family home sales and building permits, that have still not made it to prerecession highs or even come near the levels they were at in the past two business cycles.

Screen Shot 2016 12 20 at 1.21.30 PM

Brown said that many parts of the real-estate market that helped fuel growth in previous cycles have been constrained since the market collapsed.

Here's the full breakdown from Brown:

"That's partly because the supply chain was crushed during the downturn. Building costs are high. There's been a shortage of skilled workers. Shell-shocked potential buyers were reluctant to return to the market or to move up. Millennials have been slow to settle down and start families. Banks have been reluctant to lend to first-time buyers. Rents have been outpacing overall inflation, which would normally encourage home buying, but home prices have also risen, freezing out potential buyers."

Essentially, Brown's analysis identifies three issues holding back the market.

One, builders have had a difficult time getting new homes up because of a variety of increased costs associated with labor shortages and materials.

Two, young people who would be first-time buyers have delayed home purchases and have found it hard to find homes to buy even when they are ready.

And three, economic factors that were supposed to help the housing market, such as low mortgage rates, may actually be disincentivizing turnover and leading to a tighter supply.

This has seized up the supply side of the market and led to a less than dynamic real-estate recovery.

While it appears that there may be some relief — housing starts and other data appear to show some heating up in the home supply — Brown was not enthusiastic about breaking the limitations.

"Mortgage rates have risen since the election," he wrote. "However, as we saw following the Bush tax cuts, upper-income households are likely to take some of their tax savings and buy second homes and vacation homes."

Thus the problem plaguing the market may persist and the housing recovery could remain lackluster.

SEE ALSO: There's about to be a shift in who dominates the US housing market

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Watch Yellen explain why the Federal Reserve decides to raise rates

It took me less than 20 minutes to make a $20 money decision I'd been putting off for years

$
0
0

Dining_Tanza

I recently relocated to Los Angeles from New York City and took the opportunity to draw up a laundry list of things to finally get around to doing. New city, new goals, (almost) new year.

As I settled into my apartment — which, at a slightly higher cost than my NYC apartment, is much bigger and equipped with a washer/dryer and dishwasher — I checked in on my to-do list progress and noticed the one item I'd been putting off for years was still incomplete: signing up for renters insurance.

I've heard enough horror stories from acquaintances over the years to know that it's a silly, and potentially dreadful, mistake to skip out on renters insurance. Yet, according to a 2015 Insurance Information Institute poll, only 40% of American renters said they had insurance. Interestingly, California, my current state of residence, had the highest percentage of insured renters among all the states at nearly 54%.

To be clear, your landlord typically covers the cost of any damage to your building (if you live in an apartment) in the event of a fire, leak, break-in, or weather-related catastrophe. Renters insurance covers the belongings inside, including electronics, furniture, clothing, and jewelry. Actually, your belongings are covered whether they're in your home, car, or hotel room — everything you own is protected.

And while fires and break-ins (hopefully) aren't regular fare, if and when they happen, they could put you in deep financial ruin if you're not insured.

Business Insider's Libby Kane describes it best: "Having insurance is a lot like carrying an umbrella with you at all times: Most of the time it feels burdensome, but boy, are you glad to have it when the rain comes."

Suffice it to say, I'm happy to fork over $20 a month for peace of mind.

Twenty minutes or less

After leaving a browser tab open on the State Farm homepage for a few days, I eventually sat down to fill out the form and get a quote. I chose State Farm in part because they ranked highly on J.D. Power's 2016 renters insurance survey, but I'll admit their commercials are pretty good.

Living room_Tanza

I entered in my name, address, social security number (optional), the number of roommates I live with (two), and the amount of coverage I want (I don't own expensive clothing or jewelry, and I'm buying a policy for my belongings only, not my roommates', so I chose the lowest coverage option at $18,500).

I also checked off boxes for whether or not my apartment has specific security measures, like deadbolt locks, a fire extinguisher, sprinkler system, alarm system, and smoke alarm. Because I do have several of these, it translates into a $58 "discount" annually.

Within seconds, I got a quote for a premium of $17.25 a month, or $207 a year, with a $500 deductible. That price also includes $100,000 of personal liability protection, meaning I'll have coverage if someone is injured in my apartment.

What it doesn't include, however, is earthquake insurance, which I'd have to sign up and pay for separately. Thankfully, I grew up in California and know that earthquakes of home-destroying magnitude are extremely rare, so I'm OK to hold off on that for now.

I entered my credit card information on the spot and set up my effective date for January 1, 2017. After I stopped dragging my feet, the whole process took me less than 20 minutes to complete. 

Now, I'm paying less than $20 a month — really, less than 60 cents a day — for peace of mind and protection. 

SEE ALSO: Here's the type of insurance you should buy at every age

Join the conversation about this story »

Here's where you should store the money you're saving for a down payment

$
0
0

new home sales

Becoming a homeowner is a huge financial milestone. But getting there can take years of preparation, starting with saving up at least 20% of the purchase price for a down payment.

But just like with your emergency savings, don't make the mistake of stashing the money you're earmarking for a home under your mattress or even in a traditional savings account, says bestselling author David Bach, who is releasing an updated version of his hit book "The Automatic Millionaire" this month.

It's best to keep your money someplace safe and liquid, he says, particularly if you're looking to purchase in about three years.

"I'd tell you, put it in a money market account, and the reason is this: There's nothing more painful than saving for a down payment for a home and having the market go down," said Bach, who has spent 25 years in the wealth management industry.

"When it's a short-term time horizon, which is what three years is — three years is almost like tomorrow — you're better off to have safety and liquidity and see yourself making progress every month and not be losing sleep over it," he said.

In addition to security, a money market account could earn an interest rate of 1%, compared with the much lower 0.01% on a traditional savings account. These accounts can offer a higher interest rate because they usually require a minimum balance, which can vary widely depending on the bank (and if you dip under the minimum, you may incur a monthly fee).

Bach explains the risk you could be dealing with if you decide to put the money elsewhere: "Let's say you put it in a mutual fund, put it in a balanced fund, and the market goes down 3,000 points. And you've lost a third of the money you've invested. People hate that."

While a money market account is a safe bet for a time horizon of three years, Bach says he'd suggest you do something completely different with your savings if your plans for homeownership are in the distant future.

"If you said to me, 'David I'm not buying a home for 10 years,' then I wouldn't give you that advice. Then I'd tell you, 'Go use a balanced account, be 60% equity and 40% bonds, be totally diversified,'" he said.

Watch more from Business Insider's interview with David Bach:

SEE ALSO: Here are the differences between the 2 types of mortgages you can get

SEE ALSO: 9 signs you can afford to buy a home — even if it doesn't feel like it

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Don't be afraid to cancel cable — here's how to watch all of your favorite shows for less than $42 a month


A former ad exec who sold his firm to Microsoft spent the last 20 years restoring a mansion in Los Angeles — and now he's selling it for $10 million

$
0
0

leonard fenton artemesia

When Leonard Fenton first bought his home — a 13,000-square-foot architectural masterpiece called "Artemesia"— he had no idea just how much work he would end up putting into it. He was in his 20s, and though he had previously restored homes while funding an earlier music career, he had never before worked on a project of this size.

Still, he knew a valuable opportunity when he saw one.

"I've always been an autodidact. I always jump into learning what I'm working on," Fenton recently told Business Insider.

At the time of the purchase, Fenton was heading up an advertising firm, Automotive Dealers' Marketing, that he would later sell to Microsoft.

He called up a few architects who specialized in preservation, consulted the National Trust's guidelines for historic properties, and got to work on the home, considered to be the largest ever built in the Craftsman style.

"The people and sources I consulted often didn't have the answer, but they taught me how to research and get the right answers," Fenton said. "I didn't just want a neoclassical house. I wanted a piece of art."

Nearly 25 years later — most of which he spent working on the home part-time, though he has been working on the restoration efforts full-time for the last six years — he's putting the home back up for sale. It has been on and off the market for several years, but is now listed for $9.995 million with Sally Forster Jones of John Aaroe Group.

"I have enjoyed living in this beautiful castle and being the custodian of this cultural landmark immensely. In fact, I literally grew up as an adult living in that house," Fenton said. "Now that everything is done and the challenges completed, there's really nothing more for me to do. I'm ready to pass on this wonderful property to a new family who will protect and cherish it for the next twenty or thirty years as much as I have."

Let's take a look inside Artemesia.

SEE ALSO: 15 of the most luxurious mansions you can rent in Aspen

DON'T MISS: Inside the swanky private club where Bill Gates, Eric Schmidt, and Justin Timberlake go to ski

The property spans nearly two acres atop the Hollywood Hills region of Los Angeles. Artemesia was originally built in 1913 for Frederick Engstrum, a construction magnate responsible for the Rosslyn Hotel downtown.



It's on a private road and is double-gated, which adds to its secluded feel.



As you approach, you get a sense of just how big the home is.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

10 of the best American cities to live comfortably on $40,000 a year

$
0
0

Canon City, Colorado

Much of America's charm is predicated on small-town life. It's community-oriented, nostalgic, and generally more affordable than living in a big city.

In its October-November print issue, AARP The Magazine highlights 10 great hometowns for anyone on a modest budget of $40,000 a year. (See the shorter online version here).

To create the list, the magazine teamed up with Sperling's Best Places, which focuses on quality-of-life research, to determine a livability index, factoring in metrics on housing affordability, access to work and recreation, transportation, healthcare, and safety. Each city on the list has a score above the average livability index score of 50.

Read on to check out 10 US cities where life is robust and affordable.

DON'T MISS: 15 of the most fun American cities that are actually affordable

SEE ALSO: The 25 cities with the best quality of life in the US

Sheboygan, Wisconsin

Livability index: 65

Population: 115,300

Median housing price: $127,300

Sunny days per year: 188

Just one hour north of Milwaukee, you'll find this distinctly Midwestern town on the shores of Lake Michigan at the opening of the Sheboygan River, the area's main draw and a hotspot for surfing and sailing. Residents laud Sheboygan's free and affordable events and activities, including the annual Brat Days festival, a celebration of the city's most famous culinary export.



Eugene, Oregon

Livability index: 59

Population: 358,300

Median housing price: $222,000

Sunny days per year: 155

Nestled in the lush Willamette Valley, Eugene has "carefully cultivated its image as an outdoor-lover's paradise," according to AARP The Magazine. Its high concentration of nature mavens — including the area's college students and retirees — frequent farmers markets, vineyards, hiking and biking trails, museums, and galleries.



Cleveland, Ohio

Livability index: 56

Population: 2 million

Median housing price: $124,000

Sunny days per year: 166

Situated on the shores of Lake Erie, Cleveland has experienced a cultural renaissance of late, led by growing populations of baby boomers and millennials alike. The city's robust art and music scene is complemented by lively nightlife and award-winning restaurants, not to mention a renewed excitement among NBA fans with the return of hometown hero LeBron James.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

What you get for $27.3 million in one of New York City’s most expensive buildings

The 20 most expensive homes sold in America in 2016

$
0
0

delray beach

As another year comes to a close, it's the perfect time to look back at some of the hottest real estate deals to go down in the last 12 months.

Though there has been some softening in the luxury market across the US, there were still plenty of blockbuster deals worth highlighting in 2016. 

With that in mind, we asked our friends at Trulia to help us round up the biggest publicly recorded sales this year. From New York City penthouses to sprawling Palm Beach mansions, here are the most expensive homes to trade hands in 2016.

SEE ALSO: Design experts say these will be the biggest trends in American homes in 2017

DON'T MISS: A former ad exec who sold his firm to Microsoft spent the last 20 years restoring a mansion in Los Angeles — and now he's selling it for $10 million

20. A duplex atop New York's Walker Tower sold for $24 million earlier this year. It has four bedrooms and 4,871 square feet of space.

Sale price: $24 million



19. In October, Elon Musk reportedly purchased this under-construction mansion in Bel Air, his fifth in the neighborhood.

Sale price: $24.25 million

Source: Variety



18. This recently remodeled home in San Francisco's Cow Hollow neighborhood changed hands for more than $25 million. It has five bedrooms and is across the street from the Presidio.

Sale price: $25.668 million



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The 21 largest US cities ranked by ease of building wealth

$
0
0

san francisco

The best way to build wealth is to prioritize assets over income. But ensuring that your assets outweigh your liabilities can be impacted greatly by the city you call home.

This week, online personal finance consultant Bankrate.com released a report ranking America's best and worst metro areas for building wealth.

To create the list, Bankrate.com ranked the 21 largest metro areas in five categories that contribute directly to an individual's ability to build their wealth:

  • Savable income: average income after taxes and expenditures
  • Human capital: unemployment rate, educational opportunities, and productivity
  • Debt burden: non-mortgage debt per capita and average credit score
  • Homeownership: average annual change in home prices, foreclosure actions, and homeownership rate
  • Access to financial services: Percentage of workers with access to retirement plans

San Francisco came out on top as the best place to build wealth, followed by Minneapolis and Washington, DC.

“In some metro areas, like San Francisco, homeownership can be prohibitively expensive, but higher-than-average salaries can help residents stash more money away in tax-advantaged retirement accounts," wrote Claes Bell, a Bankrate.com analyst and the author of the study. "On the other hand, Minneapolis-area residents don't earn as much, but the area's affordable housing and recovering real estate market provide opportunities to build wealth over the long term through home equity."

Read on to see how the 21 largest US cities stack up for building wealth, as well as the average savable income, homeownership rate, and non-mortgage debt per capita for each city. 

SEE ALSO: 10 of the best American cities to live comfortably on $40,000 a year

SEE ALSO: The most expensive housing market in every state

21. Riverside-San Bernardino, California

Savable income: $9,790

Homeownership rate: 62.6%

Debt burden: $27,682



20. Miami

Savable income: -$3,613*

Homeownership rate: 58%

Debt burden: $25,645

*Analysis showed a negative average savable income for the Miami metro area. This may be attributable to the high population of retirees in the area who are spending more of their savings than they're earning.




19. Tampa-St. Petersburg, Florida

Savable income: $3,437

Homeownership rate: 62.7%

Debt burden: $27,015



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Single women face a unique obstacle to homeownership

$
0
0

san francisco housing crooked bent slant sliding

Linda Tetzloff searched for a home for three years near Kalamazoo, Mich., before snagging a three-bedroom, ranch-style foreclosure property for $60,000 in 2011. She loves her huge backyard with a screened-in porch, dual fireplaces, and the neighborhood, situated on a bus line into the city.

But it took her a long time to get there. A divorce and ex-husband’s bankruptcy a decade earlier had left Ms. Tetzloff all but toxic to lenders when it came time to apply for a mortgage. Traditional banks found her too risky, despite years of steady employment as an executive assistant and paralegal, punctual payment of her other bills, and a concerted effort to avoid debt but still build up credit.

“I went and got a car loan just for the credit, even though I didn’t need the … car,” she says.

At the urging of her Realtor, Tetzloff finally secured financing through a mortgage broker. But her past money troubles come back to haunt her regularly, even after five years of on-time house and car payments.

“Now I have $20,000 in equity, but I can’t get a $3,000 loan [from a bank or credit union] to put up a fence,” she says.

Even for single women who have had an easier financial go of it than Tetzloff, the goal of owning a home can be more difficult to realize than for similarly situated men, for a wide array of reasons. The persistent gender pay gap is the obvious one: Men earn more on average than women, and therefore have access to higher credit, better loans, and thus better quality homes and neighborhoods.

Those inequities persist and widen over time. According to a May analysis from real estate data firm ATTOM Data Solutions (formerly RealtyTrac), the values of homes owned by men have appreciated faster over 15 years of ownership than those owned by women. “We can look back at the purchase price versus the value now, and single men have gained 33 percent value, women 31 percent overall” says ATTOM senior vice president Daren Blomquist.

And further disadvantages linger within the home-buying process itself. A studyfrom the Urban Institute, released in September, found that single women are consistently denied mortgages at higher rates than single men, despite the fact that they are more reliable than men when it comes to actually paying their mortgages.

“Women tend to have lower income and higher debt-to-income ratios,” says Laurie Goodman, an economist and co-director of the Urban Institute’s housing finance policy center. “In many cases they look worse by the numbers and lenders are scared of taking any compensatory factors into account. They’re saying they’re applying same standards to everyone, but in an effort to prevent discrimination, we have thrown out some things that might be helpful in this instance.”

real estate house for sale mortgage

A growing demographic

Solving that disconnect is key to the long-term growth of the housing market. In the United States, women are the sole or primary breadwinners in 40 percent of households with children under 18 – a share that has quadrupled since 1960, according to the Pew Research Center. Two-thirds of those are single mothers.

Single women, meanwhile, make up approximately 17 percent of home purchases, more than double the rate of single men (despite much lower earnings), according to an October survey from the National Association of Realtors (NAR). 

“As demographics change, there will be more single people in the United States,” says Jessica Lautz, NAR’s director of surveys and research. “That market is only going to increase.”

By not catering to single women, the mortgage industry is hurting the housing industry in the long run.

“The market is missing out on an opportunity to make more money off originating mortgages to women homeowners,” Mr. Blomquist says.

The Urban Institute’s Ms. Goodman points out that a lingering effect of the housing crash a decade ago has been much tighter credit standards across the board. Such caution was sorely needed in the wake of the subprime mortgage bubble, where lenders were handing out risky loans to people who couldn’t afford them. But “marginal buyers, like women, minorities, and those with lower incomes are going to have higher denial rates than they might otherwise,” she says. “It’s not discrimination, per se, but the current standards have taken away any discretion lenders have.”

The model to assess lending risk could be more responsive, says Marcia Davies, chief operating officer of the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA), a real estate finance trade group. “We think that needs to adapt to changing demographics.”

Women phone

Women have a lot of positive group qualities that lenders should factor into their decisions, she adds. “They tend to put more money down, and past studies show that they’re more risk-averse than men,” she says.

Steps toward solutions 

To that end, the industry has started to take small steps to address the gap. In November, MBA sent a letter to the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees federal lending giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, advocating for the use of new credit scoring models. A modification “could help lenders reach approximately 45 million consumers who are either ‘credit invisible’or ‘unscorable,’ ” the letter reads.

Some underwriters, including Quicken Loans and Guild Mortgage, have launched marketing and education campaigns targeting single women. Last year, PrimeLending launched Neighborhood Edge, a program to assist moderate- and low-income homebuyers with closing costs – a way of providing some alternative lending help.

After her experience, Tetzloff says giving people a way to build credit without accumulating more debt would help the access problem immensely. “They keep telling people to save money, live as debt free as possible, but then when you do need loans no one wants to loan you money,” she says.

Once she can get the funds, she’s looking forward to putting up that fence, as well as salvaging the original hardwood floors that, happily, she found hiding under decades-old carpeting.

“It’s a lot of work, but there are perks to this place,” she says. 

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: Animated map shows the most popular fast food restaurants in every state

The 25 most expensive ZIP codes in America

$
0
0

Tribeca apartment

The 25 most expensive ZIP codes in the US are unsurprisingly concentrated on the coasts.

Real estate listings site Property Shark recently used data from all residential transactions closed in 2016 to determine which ZIP codes across the US were most expensive for buyers.

California dominated the list with 17 cities represented, including well-known places like Beverly Hills and its famous 90210 ZIP code.

New York also claimed six spots, with pricey Hamptons favorite Sagaponack coming in at No. 1.

Only ZIP codes containing more than five sold properties were considered for the list. Property Shark helped us find listings that were close to each of the ZIP codes' median sales price. Check out the full list below:

SEE ALSO: Here's how much you need to earn to be in the top 1% for the 15 largest cities in the US

DON'T MISS: 9 hidden costs that come with buying a home

25. 95030: Los Gatos, California

Median sale price: $2,180,000

This two-bedroom, two-bathroom Los Gatos home will run you around $2.3 million, but it comes complete with hardwood floors, a detached guest house, and four private acres of wooded land. 



24. 94123: San Francisco

Median sale price: $2,210,000

In San Francisco, $2.27 million will get you a home like this one, which packs three bedrooms, two and a half bathrooms, a wood burning fireplace, stainless steel appliances, and a formal dining room into 1,900 square feet. 



23. 94306: Palo Alto, California

Median sale price: $2,227,500

This three-level home in Palo Alto, on the market for $2.25 million, features quartz countertops, abundant natural light, and a fenced-in patio. 



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The most expensive housing market in every state

$
0
0

Boulder Colorado

Coldwell Banker recently released its annual Home Listing Report, which ranks the most expensive places to purchase homes in America.

Though California dominated the overall rankings, expensive homes dot the entire country. Business Insider pulled the top ranking city in each state from the report, which range from average listing prices of over $1 million in California and Connecticut to those coming in under $300,000 in places such as Arkansas and Kentucky.

To determine the most expensive cities, Coldwell Banker analyzed the average listing price of more than 50,000 four-bedroom, two-bathroom homes for the period between January 2016 and June 2016. The ranking covered 2,168 markets across the US, excluding any with fewer than 10 listings. Note that just as prices vary by location, the size of these homes can vary significantly by market as well. 

Read on to see where to find the most expensive housing market in your state.

SEE ALSO: The 25 most expensive housing markets in the US

DON'T MISS: Here's what a one-bedroom apartment looks like in America's 20 most expensive rental markets

ALABAMA: Fairhope

Population: 18,730

Average cost of a 4-bedroom, 2-bathroom house: $359,633

Median household income: $58,767



ALASKA: Anchorage

Population: 298,695

Average cost of a 4-bedroom, 2-bathroom house: $378,686

Median household income: $78,121



ARIZONA: Scottsdale

Population: 236,839

Average cost of a 4-bedroom, 2-bathroom house: $530,372

Median household income: $72,455



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Amy Schumer finally sold her 'tiny' penthouse apartment in NYC

$
0
0

Amy Schumer

Amy Schumer has finally sold her "tiny"one-bedroom co-op on the Upper West Side of Manhattan, according to Variety.

Both the buyer and the final selling price are unknown. What is known: the apartment isn't actually so tiny.

Though last year the comedian joked about how, despite her fame, she still lives in a one-bedroom walk-up apartment, she neglected to mention that it was also a penthouse, technically.

It's located on the top floor of a beautiful brownstone building, steps from the Museum of Natural History and a block away from Central Park. It totals about 850 square feet and she bought the apartment for $1.695 million in September 2014, Curbed NY reports.

Schumer quietly listed the apartment last November for $2.075 million, as was first reported by the New York Post. Nearly a year later, the price on the cozy space had been reduced to $1.625 million with new brokers. The final listing price was $1.625 million, marking at least a $70,000 loss before realtors fees are factored in.

Modlin Group now had the listing.

SEE ALSO: See inside the $5.3 million Washington, DC, home that the Obamas will move into after they leave the White House

DON'T FORGET: Follow Business Insider's lifestyle page on Facebook!

The apartment is no typical New York shoe box — it's actually a penthouse on the top floor of an Upper West Side brownstone.



A gorgeous stone entryway with a wooden door allows entrance into the five-unit co-op building.



Schumer wasn't kidding about the walk-up, however. The apartment is on the fifth floor, and there's no elevator. At least the hallways are nice.



See the rest of the story at Business Insider

The Property Brothers teach the actual meaning of tricky real estate 'code words'

Forget Mar-A-Lago — here's a look at impressive presidential retreats of the past

$
0
0

While President-elect Trump spends the holidays at Mar-a-Lago, his expansive Florida resort, we took a look at some of the western ranches and New England compounds past presidents have called home away from the White House.

Follow BI Video: On Twitter

Join the conversation about this story »

Miami's housing market could be in for a tough 2017

$
0
0

Lisa and Lenny Hochstein real housewives miami beach $10.75 millionMiami’s real estate market experienced the first wave of a slowdown in condo sales at the start of 2016, with some experts warning it could lead to a recession by the end of the year. Twelve months later, South Florida real estate didn’t implode, but the industry is beginning to feel the pinch of a bear market.

As we head into 2017, developers, brokers and investors believe construction financing for new projects will be harder to come by and condo sales will continue at a snail’s pace.

The Real Deal spoke to major players in South Florida’s real estate game to weigh in on what to expect from now through next December.

In downtown Miami, a saturation of projects marketed to buyers looking for units as investments has created too much inventory, said Dan Kodsi, developer of Paramount Miami Worldcenter and Paramount Bay.

“I really don’t believe in cycles, but I do think we are going to see some dips,” he added. “You will not see a mass sellout because these are not people who can’t make their mortgage payments. You will likely see these investor buyers taking their units off the market and renting them out.”

Arnaud Karsenti, 13th Floor Investments managing principal, also believes the condo market is oversupplied. “I don’t think it is dead by any means, but it will soften,” Karsenti said. “We remain bullish on anything that is residential or mixed-use. We like properties that benefit from Florida’s greatest trend, which is its population growth.”

Miami’s urban core currently has so much inventory, it is going to take three years to sell all those units, said Mika Mattingly, executive vice president for Colliers International South Florida.

Still, she believes downtown Miami is poised for strong growth compared to Brickell. “You will see more movement in downtown Miami,” Mattingly said. “For example, Centro Lofts has no parking and no waterfront. Yet, they are basically almost entirely sold out at close $500 a square foot. You are really going to see an urban dweller who wants to live in downtown.”

Although some observers believe 2017 will be the beginning of a new cycle on an upward trajectory. Jay Parker, Douglas Elliman’s Florida brokerage CEO, said the slowdown in 2016 was heavily influenced by the presidential election. “All the hostility and volatility caused buyers to pause,” he said. “People who would normally be in the market for real estate, whether for investment or transitional move, put the brakes on.”

Parker said he expects the market will benefit from pent-up demand in the first two quarters of 2017. “I don’t think anyone has a crystal ball, but an anticipated continued rise in interest rates will force the hand of those who otherwise don’t feel a necessity to buy,” he added.

Taylor Collins, a partner with Two Roads Development, said the first two quarters of 2016 were slow, but there was steady growth in the third and fourth quarters that will carry over into the coming year. “The market took a deep breath in 2016,” Collins said. “I don’t think you are going to see any of these mega projects with 800 to 1,000 units happen in 2017. I don’t think those can keep up with the absorption. But you will see more of the smaller, high-end boutique products.”

However, construction financing is going to get tighter in 2017, Collins warned. “Lenders are requiring you to be 50 percent sold before you can start drawing on a construction loan,” he said. “They are very aware of what happened in the last cycle in 2008 and 2009. Those days are gone.”

Ezra Katz, founder and CEO of Aztec Group, said he foresees construction financing slowing down dramatically next year.

“Underwriting standards are changing and lenders are becoming more conservative,” he said. “Lenders have a lot of loans on their books. I think projects that are contemplated as new construction and have not been financed will find it very challenging, particularly the Johnnies-come-lately or new kids in town.”

SEE ALSO: India's money mess could get worse

Join the conversation about this story »

NOW WATCH: The US is $19.9 trillion in debt — here are the countries we owe the most

Viewing all 4385 articles
Browse latest View live




Latest Images